• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/4

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

4 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Introduction


Defined


Developed

Defined - classically by A.V Dicey - no legal restraint on Parliaments law-making powers, no body/person of constitution can question the validity of primary legislation


Developed - in the 17th Century through struggle between Parliament and the Crown for supremacy - culminated in the Bill of Rights 1689 which removed powers of the monarch to arbitrarily suspend acts of Parliament

Supremacy in action


Will of Parliament


Enrolled Act

Supremacy asserts itself through the will of Parliament - identified in the Acts of Parliament 1911 & 1949


Courts developed the ‘enrolled act’ rule where they will not question the validity of an Act of Parliament which has received Royal Assent

Supremacy in Action


Unlimited competence of supremacy in support of Dicey’s view

Statute may override conventions (madzimbambuto)


Statute may override international law (Cheney)


Statute may operate retrospectively (Burmah Oil Co)


Statute may alter the constitution (Acts of Settlement)


Statute will override Prerogative powers (Miller)

Supremacy in Action


Parliament ‘Continuing’


Courts

Parliament is ‘continuing’ in nature, a later Parliament can expressly repeal all or any previous acts if it so chooses


Courts developed the doctrine of implied repeal - if a later statute is inconsistent with an earlier statute courts will impliedly repeal the earlier statute to the extent of the inconsistency (so long as it is not constitutional)