• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/30

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

30 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Collins v Sweeny

COMMON OWNERS


Couple split up and sold house they were sharing. Court were not able to order one half to sell their half to the other

Board and Management of Aberdeen College v Youngson

DERIVATIVE ACQUISITION ESSENTIALS


1) Parties


Must be two different parties involved as you cannot transfer something to yourself

PMP Plus v Keeper of the Registers of Scotland 2009

DERIVATIVE ACQUISITION ESSENTIALS


2) Property


Housing developer bought a large plot on land to build on. Would have had common areas not yet defined. They wanted to start selling off before defined and weren't allowed. Not specific enough

Burnett's Tr v Grainger 2004

DERIVATIVE ACQUISITION TRANSFER PROCESS


Distinguished Sharp v Thomson


G wanted to buy house from B and completed stages 1 and 2 but no external act. B went bankrupt and everything conveyed to her bankruptcy manager including external act so was owner of the house . Harsh results as G lost home.

Rodger (Builders) Ltd v Fawdry

VOLUNTARY TRANSFER - VOIDABLE TITLE


OFFSIDE GOAL RULE


F contracted to sell hose to RB and conveyance stage not completed. F entered second contract with B who is aware of contract with RB. B completes all 3 stages. RB complained that F breached their contract and B was in the wrong for knowing of the contract. Bs bad faith made her title voidable

Gibson v Royal Bank of Scotland 2009

VOLUNTARY TRANSFER - VOIDABLE TITLE


OFFSIDE GOAL RULE


Second granter didn't know of the first until the contract was concluded so wasn't bad faith

Scottish Widows fund v Buist

DERIVATIVE ACQUISITION


Life insurance assigned to Buist on death. Money was refused to B as M had lied about his health when he applied. B got no money as he couldn't have a better right than M.

Moncrief v Jamieson 2007

SERVITUDES


one piece of land higher up than the other. Had to go down in cars to get to the lower land over higher land so needed to be able to park on serviant land.

Compugraphics v Nikolik

PROJECTION SERVITUDE


pipe duct went into airspace of other property. This is usually encroachment delict ut they established a servitude of projection

Aberdeen Arieties ltd v Donald

REAL BURDENS


content of the burden must be within the four corners of the deed so you cant refer to another statute

Barker v Lewis

REAL BURDENS


B&B case


material detriment?


Court applied quantative approach to decide how many minutes each day the enjoyment of the property was disturbed and concluded it was a small amount

Kettlewell v Turning point

REAL BURDENS


looked at material detriment of value not enjoyment


care home neighbours complained it would lower value of their homes


they had proof of another area where same situation value had fallen

whitelaw v acheson

REAL BURDEN


House to be residence of a single family but turned into therapy centre


court said material detriment meant 'not trivial detriment'


lower standard than barker

Kkurshid Mustafa v Sweden 2011

HUMAN RIGHTS


tv satellite dish in breach of lease


argued violation of right to recieve information under art 10


HORIZONTAL CASE - court agreed with them even though it was between two private individuals

Sporrong and Lonnroth v Sweden

HUMAN RIGHTS


Article 1 protocal 1


interference with your possessions


go through usual steps - lawful, legitimate aim, proportional

Karl Construction v Palisade Pproperties

HUMAN RIGHTS


Article 1


take someone to court for 20000 you want to make sure they have the money if you are successful


the court can seize your assets and put money in a bank account as security


court automatically granted dilligence if they were asked to by the pursuer


problem if you are a defender - interference with right to possession


disproportionate, should only do this if there is risk that defenders wont be able to pay

South Lanarkshire Council v McKenna

HUMAN RIGHTS


Landlord reposess house without court order


was in the act and court read it as proportional

Commercial Union Insurance co Ltd v Watt and Cumine

LEASES


tacit relocation


when leases end unless landlord or tenant says it has ended then it continues for a year unless the terms of the lease said it would not

Burger King ltd v Rachel Charitable trust

LEASES


Wanted to get out of the lease and assign premises to a pound shop and landlord due to bad financial stability.

Dollar Land (Cumbernauld( ltd v CIN Properties ltd

Cumbernauld landlords shopping centre


paid rent the day after specified but not enough as the landlords right is absolute

Campbell v McCuttcheon

absence to reference minerals in missives of house selling meant they were included in the sale and purchaser was not obliged to give seller time to acquire minerals

Drury v McGarvie

SERVITUDE


cottage had right of vehicular access to public road and gates erected to stop animals straying


cottage owners argued they could not open the gate


said only an issue if an able bodied adult could not open gate

Dick v Clydesdale Bank

creditor of peices of land soughtt o sell and proprietor rasied action of damages as the creditor hadn't advertised the sale and made sure it got the best price reasonably obtained

Crief Highland Catering ltd v Perth and Kinross council

LEASE


Landlord said contract was breached as local authority had not upkept the wall but they had spent a fair amount of money trying to upkeep wall


none of their breaches were material enough said court

Paragon Housing Association v Manclark

LEASE


Discretionary grounds - security tenure procedure for removal - house with destroyed doors but court granted order of recovery for posession for the landlord

Cochrane v ewart

implied grant

murray v medley

implied reservation

snowy v museum hall

TRANSFER


House used as place to work from home and not allowed but court alowed it said it would be onerous to not allow it

Halkerston v Wedderburn

ENCROACHMENT


Tree roots

McKitchen v Muir

SPECIAL LIEN


inn kept their clothes until they paid