• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/9

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

9 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)

Aim of the study

To test whether use of positive reinforcement via the Funhaler could improve medical compliance in young asthmatics.

Research method and design

RM: Field experiment


D: Repeated measures design

Sample

★32 children (22 male, 10 female)


★1.5 - 6 years of age


★Random sampling

Genders, ages, number, sample technique

Independent and dependent variable

IV: The device used to administer the asthma drugs


DV: Level of adherence to the prescribed medical regime measured by parental responses on a self-report questionnaire

Procedure

Parents asked to complete a structured closed question questionnaire, about parent and child attitudes to medication and compliance BEFORE introduced to the Funhaler


★Throughout the week, parents randomly called on the phone to answer some questions on whether the parent had medicated the child the DAY BEFORE


★After the 2 weeks of using the Funhaler, parents asked to fill in another questionnaire (matched item) to allow for direct comparison)

3 mains things, types of questionnaire used

Results and conclusions

★The Funhaler did improve child and parental compliance


★ 38% more parents medicated their children the previous day (p=0.016)


★60% of children took the recommended 4 ot more cycles (p=0.02)


★Significantly more parents said they were 'always' successful


★Incentives can be used to improve clinical outcomes

5

Similarities to Bandura et al

★Both collected quantitative data


★Both can be applied to modifying childrens behaviour


★Both are developmental psychology


★Both study external influences on behaviour


★Both samples of young children

5 similarities

Differences to Bandura et al

★Chaney studied operant conditioning, Bandura studied observational learning


★Chaney was high in ecological validity, Bandura low in ecological validity


★Chaney did a field experiment, Bandura did a lab experiment with observation


★Chaney did random sampling, Bandura did opportunity sampling


★Chaney studied compliance, Bandura studied aggression

5 differences

Ethical considerations and problems

★Informed consent


★High in demand characteristics

2