• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/59

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

59 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Adults intervene in children's lives in 3 ways

Based on:


1) individual charitable work


2) ideas about social welfare, usually implemented by the state


3) children's rights

Reasons for adult intervention

1) children deserve special protection


2) young people are highly dependent and in need of resources


3) can be seen as an investment in the future

Intervention in early childhood

- in many countries there remains an inadequate investment in children's welfare


- often seen as a critical period in development


- NGOs often have to step in when governments can't e.g. Vaccination programmes

UNICEF regards early childhood interventions as an important investment in the future because:

1) Children's rights and ensuring a healthy
development


2) Economic reasons: reduced cost in the future, contribution to
economy


3) Social reasons: reducing social and economic disparities and gender inequalities


4) Political reasons: competencies set in early childhood; more
competent people, better position in global economy

Protecting children may come at the expense of families or communities

e.g. Kindertransport: UK granted asylum to German Jewish children before WW2, adults left to die

Charities in Victorian England were heavily
influenced by romantic ideas. They also often meant rescuing children from bad influence of parents

e.g. Dr Thomas Barnardo opened homes for poor children, attempted to turn them into useful citizens. Encouraged mass emigration to British colonies of Australia and Canada




crit: (i) parents portrayed as bad, (ii) not saving children but teaching them to know their place, (iii) reinforcing their low status, (iv) little
interest in the causes of poor well-being

Contemporary rescue work still resonates with ideas of rescuing innocent children from bad parents

e.g. 'Crack babies' - moral panic created over babies born addicted to crack cocaine the the USA in the late 1980s/90s




crit: (i) simplistic solution to a very complex
social issue, (ii) demonised poor, African
American mothers, (iii) didn't tackle the root of the problem

Emergence of the welfare state




BEVERIDGE Report formed the basis of post-war reforms. First attempt to introduce a universal welfare system (in 1945) to protect population 'from the cradle to the grave'.
Flat rate contribution and flat rate benefit for
everyone.

crit: (i) assumptions made about family make-up, (ii) expectations fell short consistently due to lack of funding, (iii) very popular until 1970s until Thatcher suggested people should look after themselves

Absolute poverty - deprivation of basic human needs such as food, safe drinking water,
sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and information.

- Over 1/3 of all children in developing countries are living in absolute poverty


- US also defines its poverty in absolute
measures unlike most other developed
countries which use relative measures

Relative poverty - poverty line is calculated as a percentage of the average income, rather than a set figure.

This allows for measurements of an individual or household's lack of resources, as well as an
analysis of wider issues of social inequality. Depth and degree of poverty can also be
measured.

Deep poverty - in UK 1 in 5 children live in household with less than 50% average income.

Certain groups of people are over-represented in the category of deep poverty:




- Children of asylum seekers


- Children of disabled parents


- Traveler children




Certain groups more likely to experience poverty and social exclusion

Social exclusion: poor children more likely to be unable to participate in community activities.

e.g. Child Poverty Action Group compared
ability of poorest and richest 1/5th's ability to participate in community activities. The poor group was less likely to be able to participate

Children's perception of poverty - Sutton
research with children from contrasting
backgrounds about what they felt to be most
important to them, how they identified
themselves

Findings:




- none of the children regarded themselves as either rich or poor


- all identified as 'average'


- children did not want to be perceived as
different

Impact of poverty - poor children more likely to have worse health, educational opportunities and access to services

e.g. - UNICEF state that more than 1 billion
children are severely deprived of essential goods and services they need to survive and develop


- CPAG state 18% of UK children suffer from multiple deprivations, lacking 2 or more
necessities

Social inequalities between countries -
political, economic and social factors contribute to and maintain inequality

Global capitalism, legacy of colonialism, trade tariffs, allocation of funds by governments, dept, taking in refugees, HIV, international policy

Social inequalities within countries

- Wilkinson and Picket: highlight importance of income gaps


- Saunders: income gaps due to nature of
society, not vice versa. Argues income inequality is caused by cohesive society

Social inequalities within families -


Income per household does not say anything about distribution of wealth between family members

e.g.


- often women and children get less


- household may be poor but parents sacrifice things for themselves thus protecting
themselves from poverty


-children may be materially rich but emotionally deprived

Child health = matter of international
concern




Children's health is a focus of major
international institutions e.g. WHO, UNICEF - they monitor and promote health on a global scale

e.g. - the 1924 Geneva Declaration of the Rights of the Child: "the child that is hungry must be fed; the child that is sick must be nursed"

Why does children's health matter?

- ill-health can lead to death and has negative impact in socio-economic and demographic terms. Many diseases easily preventable.
Malnutrition has negative effects, short and long term

Child survival rate has been increasing


significantly, but still long way to go.

e.g. - UNICEF report 33% reduction in global under-five mortality rate, considerable improvements in access to primary schooling, safe water, routine immunizations

Adolescents often get overlooked. Infant and child mortality rate has received lots of
attention, adolescents' health was not a priority.

- UNICEF 2011 report highlighted importance of investing in adolescents in order to break the
intergenerational cycle of poverty and inequality


- Young people are socially and demographically important

What is good health?


Not all ill-health leads to death, certain forms of ill-health are harder to identify than others

- Good health is difficult to define and identify


- WHO defines good health as 'a state of
complete, physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or
infirmity'


- Emotional health is more difficult to measure




crit: (i) some signs of health more difficult to measure, (ii) difficult to put into practice, normally doesn't focus on holistic health, narrow indic.

Different conceptualisations of health




- Western biomedical model


- Non-western models

- Western biomedical model: prevalent in
minority-world countries. Sees healthy body as 'functioning like a machine'


- Non-Western models: often have a more holistic view of health, focus on personal,
spiritual or social experience of illness

Mental health: different definitions. The
distinction between being mentally well and mentally ill is a matter of interpretation.

e.g.


1) Is a child lively or showing disturbing


behaviour, hyperactive?


2) Hearing voices may be sign of schizophrenia by Western standards but considered normal for Shamans entering trances during rituals e.g. in Inuit cultures

Obesity: Childhood obesity rates in developed world are rising: this is linked to low levels of physical activity and high-fat diet, fast foods

e.g.


1) In 2011, 1 in 10 children aged 2-10 year classified as obese (Department of Health)


2) Rising levels of obesity in China. Parents tend to over-indulge children because of one child (two as of 2015) policy

Reasons for becoming obese: low levels of physical activity and high fat diet, genetic


susceptibility, deprivation during pregnancy and early childhood

e.g. Study of men during Dutch famine in 1944-45 showed high prevalence of becoming obese as adults when exposed to deprivation during 1st half of pregnancy

Obesity and beauty standards:
DeVries
concerns about obesity not only
because of medical reasons but also shifting beauty standards and stigmatisation of obese people

- being underweight has serious health implications


- weight issues also a way of defining and reinforcing social divisions and stigmatising the poor


- fat associated with being lazy

Global inequalities: one way of illustrating global variations in ill health is to look at data of Infant Mortality Rates and Under-five Mortality Rates; may be used as an indicator of poverty.

UNICEF:


- Sub-Saharan Africa has the highest rates of child morality: 1 in 8 die
before the age of 5


- 50% of under-five deaths occur in India, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, Pakistan and China


- Bangladesh has national commitment to invest in basic social services, resulting in considerable decrease in U5MR

National inequality: child health may vary within nations e.g. by ethnic group and
socio-economic circumstances. Big disparities in income usually mean worse health among the overall population.

e.g.


1) In USA over 3/4 children with HIV/AIDS are from ethnic minorities.


2) Parts of Glasgow life expectancy for men only 67.7 compared to 78.3 in East Dunbartonshire.

Inequality within families: people who live in poverty have to allocate resources, thus maybe prioritising the health and well-being of some family members over others.

Priorities may be based on age, gender, birth
order or perceived health/disability.


Girls often have higher rates of malnutrition, greater rates of mortality.


e.g. higher risk of being aborted in India and China due to cultural expectations and practices

Magic bullets: some interventions thought of as 'magic bullets': they improve children's health but do not address other important causes of ill-health or respond to community concerns which may undermine the success of the
intervention.

e.g. Oral rehrydration salts


- Low cost intervention, prevents death via
diarrhea


-Mothers in Papua New Guinea initially administered but grew skeptical of effectiveness as did not stop flow of diarrhea




crit: ORS did not address cause of diarrhea which was often related to poverty; access to clean drinking water, sewage system

What is violence?
There are different definitions of violence.

Some regard smacking, overfeeding or smoking in front of children as violent while others don't. Definitions depends on personal ideology and social context. Fear that using the term to describe any undesirable behaviour may lead to loss of meaning.

Corporal punishment:


Used in 1970s UK schools as discipline tool. Now banned and classified as assault.

Poll of UK teacher by Times Educational Supplement (2008) found that 22% secondary teachers would be OK with caning in extreme cases.

Smacking:


Very controversial. Contradicting opinions among the general population.

- Still legal in the UK


- Only punishment that causes visible marks has been outlawed.

Contextual definitions of violence:


- Boys regarded as inherently more violent, more acceptable


- Acceptable behaviour differs between age groups

- site-specific: some behaviour acceptable at home but not at school


- underpinned by different notions of
childhood:
(i) romanticism; children inherently pure, (ii) puritan; children inherently evil/violent

Fear of violent children:


Study carried out by Barnardo's in 2008

- 49% of people regard children as danger to each other and other adults


- 43% agreed something needs to be done to protect us from children


- 35% agree the streets infested with children


- 45% agree people refer to children as feral
because they behave this way

Violence at home:


Most likely place of violence. Despite this it's still perceived as safe space. There is more fear of 'stranger danger'.

- OFSTED (2008) found that between May 2007 and August 2008 there had been 210 child deaths attributable to violence, abuse or neglect.


- Fear of strangers may be due to media e.g. abduction of Madeleine McCann, which is quite rare

Self-harm:


Regarded by some as form of illness while
others regard it as an act of violence

- Unclear statistics: problem only recently identified and acknowledged as health issue; difficult to know whether it has actually increased or just better diagnosed and recognised today.


- Seen as minority world problem but research shows incidents in Sri Lanka of self-poisoning

Violence at school:


Bullying is regarded as serious social problem in UK. Kehily says school can be seen as an
intrinsically violence place due to hierarchical structure and unfair power relations.

- Childline (2008) reported bullying as the
biggest problem they had encountered for the past 12 years

'Social Capital' - term coined by Bourdieu to
refer to value created by social relationships and connections within social network.

- Suggested that some people are not only materially poorer but also lack access to power due to having low social capital

'Symbolic Violence' - coined by Bourdieu to
explain what happened when dominant-class culture was imposed on the working class through the education system.

- Today encompasses all forms of social
hierachies imposing values, beliffs and practices on non-dominant groups


- Works in an unconscious way, altering
aspirations and legitimising a particular social order

Bullying in schools:


Research on bullying focuses on either child as victim or perpetrator. Teachers rarely accused. Children can be both victim and perpetrators at different times. Can be seen as a defensive act.

- Mills studied masculinity and violence; discusses how boys are socialised into cultures of violence within schools e.g. sport, power over women as seen as masculine and valued. People are bullied for deviating from the norm

Violence in the Community:


Not limited to war zones. In some cities in the US children are just as likely to die from guns as child soldiers; 'war-zone' neighbourhoods.

- e.g. Gang culture and knife crime are prevalent in certain areas in the UK. Violence against young men, often by other young men, has been identified as a serious source of health inequality in Scotland

Violence in war zones:


UNCRC states minimum age of 15 for army
recruitment. In the UK children can join army from 16, only since 2003 that minimum age for serving in war zones is 18.

- According to WarChild (2011) there are an
estimated 250,000 child soldiers worldwide


- Child soldiers serve various roles e.g. plant mines, deliver food



Child soldiers and conceptualisations of
innocence:


Challenges romantic idea of innocence. A young child holding gun can be seen as a victim and perpetrator of violence. Some children have no choice but to fight. Military may offer safe space.

- e.g. Child soldiers of Sierra Leone (1991); many children forced to join military but many volunteered. May have been influenced by need for food, protection and shelter.

Importance of intent:


It is important to consider the intention of


children when deciding whether an act is violent or not.

- e.g. Children in Palestine throwing rocks at
Israeli soldiers could be regarded as violence if based on political ideology. Could also be
considered non-violent if intended as a part of play

Resilience


The way in which children cope with, and even respond positively to, adversity; positive
development or even thriving under stress

- Gilligan states that resilience perspective is positive and pragmatic. Sees children as agents of change.


- Daniel states that risk and adversity doesn't
always lead to negative outcomes.
Over-protection may even prevent children from developing resilience

EXAMPLE: Bhutanese Refugees in Napal:


Children were living in adversity e.g. experienced homelessness and insecurity.

- Children adapted much faster to new surroundings


- Many showed resilience and active strategies for coping and supporting their parents

What makes children resilient?


Factors that make children resilient are complex

- need to consider: age, gender, birth order, temperament or personality, quality of relationships with family, friends or teachers

Adversity in siblings


Beardsall and Dunn studied siblings with six year age difference in UK. Observed impact of traumatic event on each sibling.

- They judged that the negative effect of the events was the same in only 31% of cases

Reacting to economic hardship


Elder et al. (1974) reviewed impact of economic hardship on children. Deprived children
adversely affected by reduction in family income, unemployed demoralised fathers. Mothers took on more responsibility and source of emotional support.

- Demonstrates effects of economic adversity on children; many effects are social and emotional consequences of hardship for parents and has repercussions for children's feeling of security and quality of parent-child relationships

Internal qualities for resilience


Boyden and Mann identified protective factors that make children resilient

- resourcefulness - need/ability to help - curiosity


- flexibility and adaptability - problem-solving


- life goals - hopefulness for future


- capacity to engage in critical thinking


- trying to take control over own lives

Other factors for resilience


Punch identified social and cultural factors for children developing resilience

Social: (i) family and community, (ii) secure
attachments, (iii) relationships


Cultural: (i) religious beliefs, (ii) cultural
expectations, (iii) value of education

Criticism of resilience research


There is a tendency to blame the individual for failure to thrive in the face of adversity.
Resilience may be too broad and vague which may make it lack practical usefulness.

- Daniel et al. states that children may appear resilient but internalising their symptoms, and thus denied much-needed support


- Most research has been carried out from a
minority world perspective.


- Not all close/peer relationships are positive

What is well-being?


Well-being can be understood as the goal that interventions try to achieve: a good quality of life. Incorporates three key dimensions:


(i) material well-being; what a person has


(ii) subjective well-being; how people think and feel about their life


(iii) relational well-being; their relationships

- McGregor (2007) states that well-being arises from:


(i) what a person has


(ii) what a person can do with what they have


(iii) how they think about what they have and can do

Indicators of well-being


- Developed to explore children's quality of life


- Research in Australia showed that children


prioritise the present (safety and security important) while adults value future work (i.e. education); both perspectives important.

- Ross et al. describes how UK grandparents play key role in listening to grandchildren and mediating. Significant source of support,


contribute to well-being


- Punch et al. found everyday food practices are powerful way to demonstrate trust and predictability; promote social and emotional
well-being and building/sustaining relationships. LAC children could
experience sense of consistency and nurture, develop autonomy and sense of control

Benefits of well-being approach


Focuses on what children feel, what they can do and be. Respects children's feelings and is based on children's current experiences.

- Expands the focus to include children's
physiology and psychology


- Emphasises the importance of the local cultural context


- Addresses 'new' areas of well-being particularly important to children; autonomy,
enjoyment/fun, relatedness and status

Criticism of well-being


The concept is too vague. Too many definitions may cause term to lose any usefulness. It focuses only on the positive, while it is impossible to ensure happiness. Questions raised over how conducive a life without adversity is.

- Morrow and Mayall; well-being is benign umbrella term which is 'conceptually muddy'. Problematic as it describes a state of being and an outcome of intervention


- Crivello et al.; well-being is socially contingent, culturally anchored and that changes over time. Differences of cultural and historical context and individual life phase are highly significant

Criticism of UNICEF Report (2007)


- available data was old and may be unrepresentative


- focuses on deficits rather than positives


- did not take in to account views of children

- Cultural factors not taken in to account e.g. ownership of books used as indicator of material well-being


- Relative indicators used; e.g. poor child in UK may be less disadvantaged than poor child in Poland given UK's national wealth